Blog - About - Tweet

  • Archives

  • Embargo, um-bongo – what’s the difference?

    March 19, 2009

    Well, no newspaper editor’s ever broken an um-bongo for the sake of writing ‘exclusive’ all over it. It’s just too damn delicious. 

    It’s a bit of a cheek at any time,  but breaking an embargo to rehash a story out of one line and a couple of past articles takes the custard cream, the bourbon and the really nice one thats made out of shortbread with jam in. 

    So, Cheltenham Town are potentially getting a loan from Cheltenham Borough Council to save them from going bust. I knew this at around 10 o’ clock this morning, when an email marked confidential and labelled embargoed until Monday, 23rd March landed in my inbox. 

    Now, in any other case a paper breaking an embargo wouldn’t suprise me. But this email didn’t contain any real information, just a note that there’ll be a press conference at x place at x time, and as such – neither did the article. 

    Just a bunch of speculation and past articles re-hashed. They hadn’t got any further information, because noone was going to talk about it until the presser. Congratulations, you’ve exclusively exposed not much. In fact, the same not much that everyone else was able to immediately after, because you rendered the embargo worthless. Top job. 

    What they’d done is capitalised on the fact that the one line in the release gave out immediate ‘ohmygodjuicystory!’ waves. Unfortunately, what they also did was ruin it for everyone, because now the story has to dribble out a bit at a time, making it confusing as everyone does their best to keep up.

    The sad part this, this will probably impact all journalists in the area for a fair while, until the parties involved learn to trust us with information again. 

    It just serves as a reminder than ethical journalism isn’t always alive and well, if you’re struggling to sell papers.

    CSS vs the Davey

    March 15, 2009

    So I finally, after a day spent tearing out chunks of hair and hurling abuse at the computer, got my new WordPress theme made. 

    It actually took numerous attempts at understanding what the hell CSS is. ‘Completely Stupid Script’ would be doing it an injustice, now that it works, however the amount of sheer patience it took to make it work means it may well be ‘C’mon, Seriously? Sh*beep*tcakes.’

    The internet’s moved on since I last tried to make a full-on webpage layout – especially with content management systems and the like. It’s actually quite amazing, in a way. 

    Here’s to you, CSS – like so many others I hated you at first, but now I’ve got to know you a bit… you’re an alright bloke.

    A week of big news, and stating the obvious.

    February 28, 2009

    So there were quite a few days of big news this week – the sad loss of Ivan Cameron and Wendy Richards, plans for military staff to be pulled out of Iraq, and the topic of this post – the plane crash in Amsterdam.

    Twitter went absolutely crazy on it. Channel 4 found an interviewee on the scene, @nipp, using the service – and a mash of rather conflicting yet very much up to the minute news arrived on my screen faster than Mr T would whip a KitKat away from you to replace it with a Snickers (fool.)

    Then came the usual – a mass of tweets from people saying ‘Twitter beat the news media by 15 minutes!’ “’Oh my god, twitter is faster than CNN! CNN Got stuff from Twitter!’ and ‘I had beans for breakfast. It gave me wind.’

    The fact is, of course Twitter got there first. I’ll put it simply: Twitter is a social network, or as I like to think of it, a giant conference call in which anyone can yell anything really loudly occasionally to be heard. It has literally hundreds of thousands of people able to access and tweet at any one time, all over the globe. Therefore it makes a wonderful source of news. CNN’s @richardquest said it best:

    twitterfast /

    I’ll explain a bit further: with Twitter, you have thousands, millions even, that can tweet away from wherever they are on the face of the Earth. The job of the journalist is to take the tweet that signifies a major event, and make sure it actually happened. This can take as long as 15, 20 minutes, even hours if officials are tight-lipped.

    Basically, there’s no accountability for those using Twitter. If they get it wrong, noone will care. On the other hand, if the BBC reported something that turned out to be exaggerated, inaccurate or even completely false, there’d be some serious consequences in terms of public trust – and the journalist’s job.

    The only thing Twitter’s changed is the fact that Joe Public can now see the sheer amount of information a journalist has to sift through to get to the real facts. I just hope it doesn’t push mainstream media into a frenzy of trying to get news out so quickly, they forget to check the basics.

    National matters are local matters. Or does it matter?

    February 18, 2009

    So I’m talking localisation. Basically, where National news is given a local angle – so if the story is about thousands being stuck down by an illness – you’d go, and find someone who was struck by the illness, interview them, and find local figures. That’s the ideal, anyway. The textbook answer – as provided by @charliebudd:

    tweetcharles

    And therefore, it’s a good thing right? Well, from what I got from the discussion yesterday, the short answer is yes, the long answer ‘yes, if it’s done well.’ – and speaking of doing it well, here’s @AdamWestbrook:

    tweetadam1tweetadam2

    Sure does, but Adam’s in a newsroom that should consider itself lucky to have a reporter AND a newsreader working at any one time. As the world turns into a black hole for moolah, newsrooms across the country are shrinking – and not in the ‘my nan seems smaller than last week’ way, in a X-files ‘where’d Jane go!?’ way. 

    The minus side is that trying to do that as a single-man newsroom is a difficult verging on impossible task. The time spent out of the office voxing people until you get lucky is the equivalent of sitting in a box of hay, when all you really need is to sew up the hole in your pants. It’s metaphorically itchy. 

    So I guess the real question is – when you don’t have the resources to have a reporter to send out on a national story to get enough audio to back up the local facts… is it not better just to get the story out? Surely, any story strong enough to stand must work on it’s own merit. 

    If you’re localising for the sake of it, listeners like @SimonBlake can tell.

    tweetsimon1

    But then, if you can get hold of local figures & facts etc that relate to the story, or even get a local businessman/councillor on the phone to talk about the subject, it’s making the story seem like it affects the listener a lot more than hearing Gordon Brown blab about it. And that’s possible, even for a single man. 

    Want to find the radio world on Twitter?

    February 14, 2009

    It’s an exciting day for finding contacts.

    Check this out. It’s a Media UK database of people who work in radio, and have twitter accounts.

    Amazing for networking, eh? Journalism students, journalists, and PRs everywhere have just had a hefty task made a lot easier.

    Now, if only there was one of all their personal phone numbers… oh, wait – you can get those for 16 quid off ebay, apparently.

    -dn.

    Basically, this man is correct.

    February 12, 2009

    I agree with everything Mr Dave Lee says, so I thought I’d make a short post to, well, say that I agree.

    I agree, Dave Lee.

    It even rhymes.

    Twitter, Journalism and C4′s @krishgm

    February 8, 2009

    Krishnan Guru-Murthy recently tweeted ‘if you can’t tell it in 140 characters, it’s not a story’.

    And I whole heartedly agree with that – it’s what you’re taught in the first scriptwriting class in your first year – your top line should be able to stand by itself. If the listener hears nothing else, if they merely catch the first ten or so words when nipping through the front room into the kitchen, they should still know the gist of the story.

    The next lines, and the audio clips that go with that top line are embellishment. They explain the rest of the story.

    Here’s a slightly tenuous example: if a dodgy bit of victorian building means three hundred people have been injured in a building collapse in Tewkesbury, then you need to make sure the fact that a.) a building has collapsed, and b.) 300 people were injured by it. That’s the NEWS. The reason for it is interesting enough to include, but the story still holds when it’s left out.

    Think you can live without technology?

    January 31, 2009

    So i’m writing this on my swanky new iPod touch, and by crikey it’s amazing. It’s been a bit of a blackout this week, when you move a radio station and you’re left without email it’s a stark reminder of how much you rely on it. I’ll update in detail when I’m back on the laptop, including a review of this magical device!

    You know you love your job when…

    January 24, 2009

    I’ve been thinking about the beginning of my career over the last few hours, and I’ve decided it probably couldn’t have gone any better.

    Now, If you’d asked me four months ago, I’d probably have thrown soggy tissues at your feet and hurled a string of abuse. I’d use a string… mainly because that way I could pull it back and re-hurl – it’s all about recycling these days.

    But that’s because I hadn’t got the job I wanted – and it IS difficult to get a job in the industry. I worked, mostly for free, gratis, pas repay-le-ment (read it in a French accent) for two years whilst studying, but crikey, it was worth it.

    Now radio isn’t a rich industry, but that’s not why people get into it – the money is secondary, but the enjoyment is key.

    The thing that made me realise this? Having finished covering Saturday breakfast at 1 this afternoon, I had successfully completed a 60-hour week which included having a throat infection and general snuffly-ness… but I couldn’t shake my good mood.

     

    (I know, it’s a bit heartfelt this one – but I hope anyone who’s looking to get into the industry and struggling sees it as a ray of hope in an otherwise frustrating existence… trust me, it’s hard work – but to spend the rest of your life actually doing something so fulfilling is actually worth every single ‘Thanks for applying, but, well, we’re scared of employing someone new’ letter you’ll ever recieve. Trust me.)
    -d.n.

    History’s been made.

    January 22, 2009

    There’s something to be said for making my first blog post on the day America has it’s first full day with a new President. That something is ‘that’s a coincidence.’

    All kidding aside it’ s a real turning point for a country that’s basically a bit of a shambles right now. The scary part for Barack Obama has to be the fact that he literally has to hit the ground Usain Bolt style – and to be fair to him, he did. 

    There’s a way to tell a potentially great leader from a well, potentially rubbish one. Obama had ten inauguration balls – now that’s not bad considering Hitler only had one… so I was told in the playground.

     Closer to home, the NHS has a new constitution… which basically says you have a responsibility not to be fat, else you don’t have as much of a right to free treatment and medicine. My favourite part of the story was the health secretary promising that it doesn’t mean we’d all have the ‘broccoli police’ rifling through our diets. I could think of nothing scarier – mini green trees in bulletproof vests asking why you’ve not eaten spinach for a week. I can’t even consider what I’d do if they had pea-shooters.

    Highlight of the day? Asking Arthur Smith where he got his ridiculously colourful trousers – only to be told they were ‘Jean Paul something – one of a kind!’. Check them out here.

     

    -d.n.